Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Just Say No!

The GOP Regime,  with DINO help, has manages to sneak abstinence only funding into the Senate version of the Health Care bill.

NoAbstinence ABSTAINING FROM MAKING SENSE.... If there's one thing conservatives claim to hate, it's wasteful federal spending on programs that have been proven not to work.

Unless we're talking about funding for abstinence programs, in which case conservatives love wasteful federal spending on programs that have been proven not to work.

Proponents of sex education classes that focus on encouraging teenagers to remain virgins until marriage are hoping that the rescue plan for the nation's health-care system will also save their programs, which are facing extinction because of a cutoff of federal funding.

The health-care reform legislation pending in the Senate includes $50 million for programs that states could use to try to reduce pregnancies and sexually transmitted disease among adolescents by teaching to them to delay when they start having sex.

Under the federal budget signed by President Obama, such programs would no longer have funds targeted for them.

"We're optimistic," said Valerie Huber of the National Abstinence Education Association, which is lobbying to maintain funding for the programs. "Nothing is certain, but we're hopeful."

Bush/Cheney spent about $150 million a year on abstinence programs that failed miserably. Obama's budget directs funds to "teenage pregnancy prevention" for programs that have been "proven effective through rigorous evaluation." The right objected, arguing that limiting funding to effective programs would exclude their preferred initiatives. Obama didn't budge.

But abstinence proponents believe health care reform might offer new opportunities, in large part because Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) pushed a measure to provide $50 million to states to use for abstinence programs. It was approved in committee thanks to the support of a couple of conservative Democrats, and for some reason, the provision ended up as part of the legislation passed by the Senate. (Hatch described himself as being "as surprised as anyone" to see the provision remain in the bill.)

Reality has been stubborn on the question of abstinence effectiveness, and policymakers shaping the final health care bill would be wise to acknowledge it. The nonpartisan National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy found that abstinence programs do not affect teenager sexual behavior. A congressionally-mandated study, which was not only comprehensive but also included long-term follow-up, found the exact same thing. Researchers keep conducting studies, and the results are always the same…

Inserted from <Alternet>

There’s actually more damning evidence.  The following is the ten states with the nation’s highest teenaged pregnancy rates. 

  1. Nevada (113)
  2. Arizona (104)
  3. Mississippi (103)
  4. New Mexico (103)
  5. Texas (101)
  6. Florida (97)
  7. California (96)
  8. Georgia (95)
  9. North Carolina (95)
  10. Arkansas (93)

Inserted from <About.com>

With the exception of parts of Arkansas, California and Nevada, we’re looking at the reddest of the red here, the places where abstinence only is taught most.  While I certainly hope this will be stripped from the final bill in conference, you can visit the Politics Plus poll and make a New Years resolution to give up abstinence.  Just say no! ;-)

7 comments:

Lisa G. said...

If that stays in and the 'coat hanger' stays in, that's gonna say something about how the Repubs and Blue Dogs control the policy, even though they are in the minority. Dems take note, this is how it's done.

MadMike said...

Lisa makes a good point TC. Like I said on Facebook this whole thing just blows me away. These Jesus Jumpers have no clue as the life's realities, and it is my personal experience that those who squawk the most about this abstinence nonsense do NOT practice what they preach. "Nuff said :-)

TomCat said...

Lisa, I hope that we will not stoop to their tactics.

Mike, I know they're not practicing it. I wouldn't either, if I weren't so dang ugly! ;-)

okjimm said...

Whew.... for a minute I thought i was supposed to abstain from beer!!

Dave Dubya said...

Yes, it's a good thing we have conservative politicians from those states to teach the rest of us lessons in morality.

We'd be utterly lost without 'em.

Kevin Kelley said...

Conservative's got it wrong. Liberals won't ruin this nation... the so-called "moral majority" will. Conservatives sure hate the idea of a big brother state, but when it comes to issues like sexuality, they don't mind the government getting in between the sheets.

Maybe if the government stepped back and allowed the responsibility to fall on the family to discuss these matters, the government would have the time and money to combat more pressing issues...

I guess in the eyes of the religious right I am going to hell...

TomCat said...

Jim, bite your tongue!! ;-)

Dave, congrats on being visitor number 25,000!!

Kevin, I once asked a particularly persistent uninvited proselytizer where she would spend eternity. She replied, "Why, in heaven, of course." My answer: "It will be hell when you get there."