Sunday, October 18, 2009

Oregon Congressman Frustrated

Before I moved a little over three years ago, Earl used to be my Representative.  He’s a bit odd in his mannerisms, but he’s an authentic progressive who reflects the way a lot of us feel.

Earl Blumenauer Representative Earl Blumenauer should be experiencing the most fulfilling days of his more than 35 years in public service.

The liberal Democrat from Portland, Ore. — known for his bowties, his Trek bicycle and a pragmatic brand of progressivism — embraced Barack Obama’s presidential candidacy early in 2008 and campaigned hard alongside him, steadily gaining confidence that the young senator from Illinois was the ideal liberal remedy to eight years of conservative dominance.

Now political reality has set in, testing Mr. Blumenauer’s faith that Mr. Obama’s election and big Democratic majorities in Congress would yield quick advances in the progressive agenda.

Instead of forging ahead, Mr. Blumenauer, 61, finds himself fighting to retain one of the touchstones for liberals this year, a public insurance option in the health care overhaul, and is watching his hopes of curbing global warming grow cold in the Senate. Mr. Blumenauer, a seven-term congressman, is bracing for a tough vote on sending more troops to Afghanistan while he frets about the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay remaining open.

“It has been a hard landing for a lot of the people that I represent,” Mr. Blumenauer, referring to his largely liberal constituency, said as he assessed the first months of the Obama administration.

As health care legislation moves to the floor with other major issues close behind, the question for Mr. Blumenauer and those who share his ideology will be whether they relent on some of their core beliefs to support less satisfying compromises, despite being in what, on the surface, is a commanding political position.

“It is still something that I am struggling with,” he said.

Mr. Blumenauer is just one example of what might be called the Frustrated Left, a substantial caucus of Congressional Democrats who dreamed that Mr. Obama would usher in a new era of liberal problem-solving only to see Congress and the new administration collide with the old problems of partisanship, internal disagreement and the challenge of mustering 60 votes to get just about anything done in the Senate… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <NY Times>

The rest of this article is worth reading, because it describes the conflict he feels between sticking with what he knows is right and settling for less for fear he will get nothing.  Personally, I have decided that I would rather see no health care reform at all than delivering millions of mandated customers into the greedy claws of the virtually unregulated insurance industry.

4 comments:

Mary Ellen said...

Personally, I have decided that I would rather see no health care reform at all than delivering millions of mandated customers into the greedy claws of the virtually unregulated insurance industry.

I'm with ya on that one!

TomCat said...

Good. Let's quit while we're ahead. ;-)

Distributorcap said...

i agree totally with you

gut feeling - the bill we get will make things WORSE

TomCat said...

Thanks DC. Hope you're wrong. Fear you're right.